Yes, I hate movie reviewers. I am including myself to some degree, although no one is paying for my opinion. I read the reviews for Wolverine yesterday before seeing it at the midnight showing and all of the bashing had me concerned. Don’t believe the bullshit. It’s a great, fun(ny) and action packed start to the summer movie season.
Hugh Jackman was great, fully embracing the character and story and making even preposterous scenes feel genuine. This is another case that depending on your knowledge of the original comic books your mileage may vary as far as overall enjoyment. If you’re going to get pissy about every little detail not being carried over from the books, or about the filmmakers taking certain liberties then you’ll have some issues. If you haven’t read the books or are more forgiving, I think you’ll enjoy the crap out of this like I did. However, I do wish Deadpool, Agent Zero and Gambit got a bit more screen time because what was there was simply awesome.
Only 3 things got me, and all were FX related. First is Cyclops… who in general I just don’t care for, but the younger version is on screen a few times and the eye-beam gets to do some spectacular damage. Here is the first issue. Where does the eye-beam effectiveness end? It cuts through buildings but then it just stops? Seemed like they got lazy and didn’t want to have to animate another building falling down.
The other two were just crappy/weird FX that felt out of place when compared to the rest of the polished pieces throughout. One is a mirror shot with Wolverine’s claws… looked crappy and plastic. The other was a close up of Wolverine shredding a fire escape. Watch for those two and see if you agree.
Anyway, I think you’ll have a good time if you’re a fan of the X-men movies or the Wolverine character. It tells a great story, explaining a lot about the character and his motivations, his rivalries and attitude. Don’t listen to toolbag reviewers (including me) and go check it out for yourself.
![[del.icio.us]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/delicious.png)
![[Digg]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/digg.png)
![[Google]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/google.png)
![[LinkedIn]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/linkedin.png)
![[StumbleUpon]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/stumbleupon.png)
![[Windows Live]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/windowslive.png)
![[Yahoo!]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/yahoo.png)
![[Email]](http://iconogeek.com/wp-content/plugins/bookmarkify/email.png)
Loading ...
I thought the movie was good, not great.
Funny, the exact thing that got to me was some of the effects. I texted this to Chuck earlier. The main one for me was the claws in the bathroom as well. It took me out of the movie for a minute it was so bad. Looked like the kind of effect I would expect to see in a made for tv movie on the Sci-fi network about a giant mutated snake in Miami. His escape from the farm house on the motorcycle got to me as well. his digging the claws in the ground and spinning the bike arround looked stupid. Yes, the fire escape was brutal. I told Chuck I give the movie a B- at best, and those scenes really were the reason. I would give those three scenes an F+.
Agreed, Reynolds was good, and not used nearly enough.
It was good, I expected a little more though.
I gotta agree, and Jason and I will be talking about this and Star Trek on tonight’s podcast. I love Wolverine, one of my favorite characters, but I also love Deadpool and I wasn’t onboard at all with what they did to the character.